HU240 Herzing Wk5 Assessment Analyze And Infer Before I’ll Be Beaten

Unit 5 Assessment – Analyze and Infer

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 10:59pm


  • Points
     85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a

    file
     upload

Instructions

Develop: Essay


Evaluation
 Title: Analyze and Infer

Watch the following video.

As you watch the video, think about the following:

  • What do you think the song means about Being Beaten?
  • Why do you think Joe chuckles so much?
  • How did you react to listening to the interchange between Joe and the interviewer knowing that Joe was a very old man who had been a slave in the South?
  • What do you think about when you hear Joe McDonald talking from personal experience about being a slave picking cotton in the American South?
  • Why does he use a word that non-black people should not use in today’s world?
  • Does it have a different meaning now than it did then?
  • What reality does this song depict for Joe and people like him?
  • In what ways is that reality still present in today’s world, perhaps just dressed up to be more covert?

After taking notes during the video, write an essay addressing each of the questions. Include evidence from the video, and provide a strong analysis about the relationships that the world that Joe lived in to the world that you now live in. Draw from personal experience as well as from stories you have heard from your family members or others in your community.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Reference

McDonald, J., (1940). Before I’ll be beaten. Retrieved from

Rubric

HU240 Unit 5 Assessment – Analyze and Infer

HU240 Unit 5 Assessment – Analyze and Infer
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment

instructions

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

 14.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

 12.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

 11.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

 9.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 6.0 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

 2.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 1.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
6.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

 5.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

 3.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

 2.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

Next